Ukraine lodges protest against Syria’s recognition of CrimeaWorld October 24, 13:49
Diplomat: Russia is ready for 'asymmetric response' to tougher US sanctionsRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 24, 13:25
Putin supports plans of OSCE armed mission in Ukraine — KremlinRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 24, 13:22
Kremlin in doubt if separation of Syria opposition from terrorists "is possible at all"Russian Politics & Diplomacy October 24, 13:18
Press review: Moscow sharing Syria intel with Turkey and Russia's defense spendingPress Review October 24, 13:00
Diplomat: Too early to say who attacked Russian Foreign Ministry’s old websiteRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 24, 12:31
Moscow says no prerequisites for Lausanne format meeting before US electionsRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 24, 12:02
Russian-made software supplies to state agencies to double in 2016 — ministerBusiness & Economy October 24, 11:24
Testing on system to shield Russian Defense Ministry from cyberattacks completedMilitary & Defense October 24, 11:18
This content is available for viewing on PCs and tabletsGo to main page
MOSCOW, May 21. /TASS/. The Ukrainian parliament’s resolution empowering the government to declare a freeze on the payment of foreign debts is an absurd decision by the authorities in Kiev undermining Ukraine’s credibility with foreign lenders, polled financial analysts have told TASS.
As he explained the need for giving the government the special powers to suspend foreign debt payments, Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseny Yatsenyuk claimed that it would apply "exclusively to private lenders who are owners of Ukraine’s debt liabilities." Kiev looks prepared to go to great lengths in attempts to present the $3 billion worth of Ukrainian bonds Russia purchased in December 2013 as private lending. In combination with the loans issued to Ukraine by Russia’s commercial debts Kiev owes to Moscow a total $28 billion. Ukraine’s overall debt at the end of 2014 stood at $72 billion.
The Ukrainian authorities’ latest demarche drew an angry response from the Russian leadership. President Vladimir Putin called upon government ministers for protecting Russia’s interests. Finance Minister Anton Siluanov has already declared that Ukrainian debtors would be taken to an international court.
"The Ukrainian parliament’s just-adopted law does not hold water, because it harms the image of Ukraine and by no means contributes to a solution of its financial problems. By declaring its right to suspend foreign debt payments Ukraine has steered itself up a dead end," the director of strategic analysis and research at Russia’s Vneshekonombank, Vladimir Andrianov, told TASS. "The world’s leading rating agencies assign negative credit ratings to Ukraine. With its reputation harmed, Kiev will have no chance to make extra borrowings and settle interest on foreign debts," he said. Russia’s Vneshekonombank owns part of the Ukrainian bonds Russia had acquired. The analyst does not exclude the possibility Russian financial institutions will begin to file lawsuits at international courts.
"Ukraine has declared its intention to join the European civilized community as an equitable member and at the same time it is adopting a decision that does not look civilized at all. If Kiev hopes that in this way it will achieve a rescheduling of its foreign debt, it is making a big mistake. For debt rescheduling the lenders and borrowers normally negotiate concessions and debt prolongation terms. Kiev just wants its debts to be written off. I cannot recall a single instance of any modern country declaring refusal at the state level to pay its debts," Andrianov said.
"I suspect that the International Monetary Fund will not agree to disburse another tranche to Ukraine, because Kiev ignores its terms. But it is quite possible the authorities in Kiev are about to declare a default and ask the IMF for a stabilization loan of the sort that were extended to Russia and South Korea in 1998," Andrianov said.
"I have no certainty Russian banks will take a loyal attitude to the Ukrainian government’s right to freeze foreign debt payments. This kind of a decision cannot be taken unilaterally, it must be agreed with the creditors. The $28-billion dollars that Ukraine owes to Russia’s private and commercial banks co-owned by the state is quite a fortune. If Kiev’s financial authorities have developed problems, why are they so eager to shift them onto somebody else’s shoulders? In case of a delay or Ukrainian banks’ failure to pay the debts Russian banks will be unable to honor their own liabilities to partners," the president of the Association of Russian Banks, Garegin Tosunian, has told TASS.
"Moratorium is a fine word, but it merely conceals Ukraine’s intention to abuse its financial obligations and the inadequate behavior of the authorities in Kiev," Tosunian said.
Financial expert Yuri Kobaladze agrees: "Refusal to pay the debts has always been seen as something wrong and indecent. The decision in favor of a debt payment moratorium reduces Ukraine’s credibility rating to nothing."
TASS may not share the opinions of its contributors