Azerbaijan and Armenia report armed clashes in Karabakh conflict areaWorld February 25, 11:45
Head of Russian delegation to OSCE PA says Ukraine not ready for dialogueRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 25, 5:02
Russian baritone Hvorostovsky cancels concerts due to continuing treatmentSociety & Culture February 25, 3:22
Russian prime minister declares 3rd Winter World Military Games openMilitary & Defense February 24, 22:33
Russia to veto UNSC resolution imposing sanctions on Syria — envoyRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 24, 22:29
Ukrainian MP Savchenko arrives in Donetsk republic to visit Ukrainian prisoners — agencyWorld February 24, 22:25
Russian Defense Ministry surprised over German MPs reaction to Reichstag miniature plansRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 24, 16:32
Iraq's PM orders airstrikes on IS positions in SyriaWorld February 24, 16:09
Nord Stream 2 financing model to be ready by year end - OMVBusiness & Economy February 24, 13:44
This content is available for viewing on PCs and tabletsGo to main page
MOSCOW, December 9. /TASS/. NATO’s Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg, who told the UN Security Council last Friday the operation by the alliance and its partners in Afghanistan had been a success, clearly set a fresh example of wishful thinking, the deputy director of the Institute of US and Canada Studies, Major-General Pavel Zolotaryov, told TASS.
“Even if one admits that the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan performed well enough at first by ousting the Taliban movement from power in Kabul, it must be remembered that the United States owed that success largely to Russia. After the 9/11 attacks on New York, when the United States was about to launch its anti-terrorist operation in Afghanistan, NATO’s alliance was still “slumbering in peace,” and it was Moscow that had managed to come to terms with Afghan field commander Ahmad Shah Massoud and arm his supporters, thus contributing to the victory over the Taliban,” Zolotaryov said.
“NATO and its partners have not achieved not a single aim of those the United Nations identified in the ISAF mandate. Moreover, at a time when the operation is about to be brought to an end the United States has been urging the authorities in Kabul to come to the negotiating table with the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. In fact, this is tantamount to the recognition the enemy has not been defeated,” a leading research fellow at the Institute of the US and Canada Studies, Yuri Morozov, has told TASS. In 2010 Morozov led a joint Russian-Danish peace project in Afghanistan.“The West had promised Kabul its economic assistance for creating modern industries. Instead Afghanistan has turned into a global leader in the production of narcotic drugs. The United States and its allies had hoped to plant their ideology of ‘democratic values’ on Afghan soil. The country’s population has rejected it,” Morozov said. “Instead of the original ISAF force of 130,000 only a tiny contingent of 11,000-12,000 will be left in Afghanistan. And NATO is now desperate in its attempts to persuade Uzbekistan to allow this moderate group to be stationed in its territory, and not in unsafe Afghanistan.”
“The ISAF success, achieved by ousting the Taliban from power in Afghanistan in 2001 vanished with the 2003 US invasion of Iraq, which caused the Islamic radicals to rally together and eventually resulted in the expansion of the Islamic State in the Middle East. From the day of the United States’ invasion of Iraq the situation in Afghanistan started going out of control. The abortive intervention produced a stalemate in the entire region of the Middle East and Southwest Asia and resulted in a grave defeat of the United States,” the director of the Russian Academy of Sciences’ Centre for International Security, Aleksey Arbatov, told TASS.
TASS may not share the opinions of its contributors