Putin appoints Anatoly Antonov Russia’s ambassador to USRussian Politics & Diplomacy August 21, 15:11
Death toll in terrorist attacks in Catalonia grows to 15World August 21, 14:36
Expert says Russia halted global warming for one yearScience & Space August 21, 14:01
Moscow slams suspension of US visa procedures throughout RussiaRussian Politics & Diplomacy August 21, 13:58
Russia inks deal to launch two South Korean satellites on Soyuz rocketScience & Space August 21, 13:33
Poll reveals Russians take pride in country’s symbolsSociety & Culture August 21, 13:15
Press review: Moscow works to cool off US-North Korea spat and Japan eyes peace treatyPress Review August 21, 13:00
Passenger ground effect vehicle seating 100 to be created in Russia in 2020-2022Military & Defense August 21, 12:35
Australian cyclist Perkins gets Russian passportSport August 21, 12:21
LUXEMBURG, March 28. /TASS/. The European Court of Justice of General Jurisdiction has declared the EU sanctions against a number of Russian companies, including state-owned oil company Rosneft that were imposed in connection with the situation in Ukraine, justified. That is according to the court’s verdict on the claim of Rosneft against the EU Council.
Rosneft lawyer said the decision on sanctions is final and not subject to appeal.
The court found that there are no facts that could challenge either the validity of the decision (of the Council of the EU on sanctions) or the legal norms adopted on its basis.
This verdict can become the basis for a similar decision on the lawsuit of Rosneft in the Higher Court in London, and also creates a precedent for making judgments on claims of other Russian companies.
The court ruled that the EU sanctions against Rosneft must not be used for suspension of banking payments or any other form of freezing of the company's assets.
According to the court’s verdict, prohibitive measures do not concern payments (of the company) by banks. They are not aimed at freezing bank assets (of the company).
This verdict can become the basis for a similar decision on the lawsuit of Rosneft in the High Court in London, and also creates a precedent for making judgments on claims of other Russian companies.