Russian, Indian students creating friendship satelliteScience & Space August 16, 21:46
Zenit St. Petersburg loses 0:1 against FC Utrecht in first leg of Europa League play-offSport August 16, 21:34
Saakashvili plans to return to Ukraine on September 10World August 16, 21:23
Russian diplomat concerned over US and North Korean aggressive statementsRussian Politics & Diplomacy August 16, 20:32
Diplomat says US-made chemical weapons found in Syria prove West’s support for terroristsRussian Politics & Diplomacy August 16, 20:14
Russia’s St. Petersburg to host World Travel Awards in SeptemberSociety & Culture August 16, 19:37
Combat aircraft to make up over 50% in Russian state arms seller’s exportsMilitary & Defense August 16, 19:22
Poroshenko orders probe into reports about supplies of missile technologies to North KoreaWorld August 16, 19:08
Over 700 policemen to provide security at UEFA Europa League’s match in Russia's KrasnodarSport August 16, 19:02
MOSCOW, December 22. /TASS/. The Lithuanian court has upheld the decision of the local Competition Council, which imposed a 35.6 mln euros fine on Russian gas giant Gazprom in 2014, Reuters reported.
The fine was imposed after the Russian company had refused to sign a gas swap deal with Lietuvos energijos gamyba (former Lietuvos energija), Lithuanian agency BNS reported.
According to the local antimonopoly agency Gazprom’s refusal to sign the deal prevented the Lithuanian company from signing agreements with other gas suppliers. That meant that Gazprom violated the terms of the permission for the acquisition of 34% in Lietuvos dujos, that had been given by the Competition Council in 2004.
A deal with a European company would have allowed with Lietuvos energijos gamyba to decrease spending on gas. In its turn this would have adjusted prices of electricity for consumers, officials with the Competition Council said.
In 2012, Lietuvos energija, which sold the Russian natural gas, asked Gazprom to grant its consent for gas swap.
In 2015, Gazprom tried to challenge the fine in a court of Vilnius but the court rejected the claim.