WADA’s move shows trust in Russia’s anti-doping measures — ministerSport June 28, 1:02
US disciplinary procedure against jailed Russian businessman Bout delayed — attorneyWorld June 27, 23:16
FIFA report on Russia’s 2018 World Cup bidding proves legitimacy of its win — deputy PMSport June 27, 21:08
FIFA report on Russia’s 2018 bidding dismisses Western media allegations — LOC chiefSport June 27, 19:53
Encrypting ransomware Petya attacks computers worldwide — Kaspersky LabBusiness & Economy June 27, 19:23
Kremlin says its computers not affected by hacker attackRussian Politics & Diplomacy June 27, 18:55
Security experts urge Putin, Trump to overcome disagreementsWorld June 27, 18:51
Jury to deliver verdict on Nemtsov murder case on June 28Society & Culture June 27, 18:42
Syrian president visits Russia’s Khmeymim airbaseWorld June 27, 18:17
BEIJING, November 8. /TASS/. Russian authorities do not consider limiting currency operations due to declining rouble rate, Minister of Economic Development Alexey Ulyukayev told reporters on Saturday.
He responded with a ‘No’ to the question whether the authorities were considering introducing limits for currency operations.
During the trade on Friday, the dollar and euro rates jumped to their maximum ever levels - 48.65 roubles (for one dollar) and 60.27 roubles (for one euro). However, by end of the trade session, the rates went down to 46.7 and 58.22 roubles respectively.
Market participants had mentioned the Central Bank (Bank of Russia) could limit capital operations due to weaker rouble.
Russia’s Ministry of Economic Development considers as rational the decision of the country’s Central Bank (Bank of Russia) to have a floating rouble rate from 2015 despite of the current decline, Ulyukayev told.
“Tactics may differ. The one offered by the Bank of Russia is quite rational and should bring its results,” the minister said.
He also called correct the Central Bank’s decision to introduce a new instrument - repo operations in currency for the term of 12 months. However, he said, that decision should have been made “slightly earlier.