NATO rejects media claims alliance unable of quick deploymentWorld October 21, 13:01
Russian senior diplomat: Moscow has 'no doubts' that Iran fulfilling JCPOA dealRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 21, 11:04
Monuments to Soviet troops in PolandWorld October 21, 10:57
Putin and Erdogan give positive assessment to joint efforts in Astana processWorld October 21, 3:03
Privileges to certain languages in Ukraine’s education law to worsen situation — diplomatRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 20, 21:46
International balance of forces in Syria after Raqqa’s liberation unclear yet — expertMilitary & Defense October 20, 21:05
Russia to resume import of aubergines, pomegranates from Turkey since October 30Business & Economy October 20, 20:18
International station to orbit Moon at 70,000 km distance from EarthScience & Space October 20, 20:09
US indulging in lies to have UN-OPCW mission’s mandate extended — Foreign MinistryRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 20, 19:31
MOSCOW, October 24. /TASS/. Russia’s agricultural watchdog Rosselkhoznadzor has dismissed as futile Ukraine’s complaint to the World Trade Organization (WTO) over Russia’s ban on the import of Ukrainian crop produce, imposed on October 22, the agency’s chief Sergey Dankvert told TASS on Friday.
“When we introduce bans we are perfectly aware that lawsuits may follow. In this particular case, we have considered all likely options,” he explained.
Dankvert said that before lodging a protest to the WTO, Ukraine will have to hold consultations regarding the previous Rosselkhoznadzor bans. In the meantime, the history of bans indicates that Russia has repeatedly drew Ukraine’s attention to the quality and safety of the products it provides, the official said.
Rosselkhoznadzor’s full ban on the import of Ukraine’s quarantined products is a fourth restrictive measure by the Russian watchdog in a row. Earlier, the agency restricted the import of potatoes, the presence of foods in hand luggage, and then supplies of soybeans, Dankvert recalled.
“Uncontrolled cargoes keep crossing the border, which is evidence that their veterinary service defaults on its obligations. For this reason, their intention to build a wall along the border is very useful from the standpoint of veterinary and phytosanitary safety,” Dankvert said.