Syrian authorities rule out ceasefire if militants refuse to leave Aleppo — ministryWorld December 06, 14:55
Turlish PM praises Moscow, Ankara efforts in fight against terrorismWorld December 06, 14:36
Stoltenberg wants NATO relations with Russia to be 'frank and open'World December 06, 14:28
Russian doctor injured in Aleppo hospital attack is in stable conditionWorld December 06, 14:08
Lavrov explains causes of refugee crisis in EuropeRussian Politics & Diplomacy December 06, 14:04
Russia’s top diplomat says ECHR decisions should not be politicizedRussian Politics & Diplomacy December 06, 14:02
Russia’s large anti-submarine warfare ship enters English ChannelMilitary & Defense December 06, 13:42
Lavrov invites those concerned over human rights situation on peninsula to visit CrimeaRussian Politics & Diplomacy December 06, 13:38
Kremlin refuses to comment on terms of releasing Ukraine filmmaker SentsovRussian Politics & Diplomacy December 06, 13:27
“This is not true. Rosneft did not initiate this. This is disadvantageous for Rosneft,” Sechin said.
A senior Russian lawmaker earlier asserted that Gazprom and Rosneft had come up with an initiative to simplify the access of foreign firms to the Russian continental shelf.
Pavel Zavalny, deputy head of the State Duma energy committee, said at the time it was impossible today to “attract foreign investments, technologies and experience to the shelf without foreign companies’ full-fledged participation in the projects and this is impeded by the provisions of the current legislation on subsoil.”
Today the role of foreign investors is mainly reduced to holding stakes in the charter capital of companies performing the functions of an operator under a contract with a license holder, the lawmaker argued, adding that this practice made foreign companies uninterested in the development of natural resources deposits.Therefore, the lawmaker further asserted, Gazprom and Rosneft proposed amending the legislation to envisage “a possibility to issue and re-issue an extraction license to a separate subsidiary of a legal entity.”
The Russian lawmaker asserted that in the opinion of Gazprom and Rosneft proposing such amendments, “this will create a legal framework for using the best international experience in developing the continental shelf without a loss of state control over continental shelf developers because the basic requirement will be kept for the presence of a share of the Russian Federation in the charter capitals and a possibility to control more than 50% of the charter capital of companies.”
The Russian lawmaker further argued that the amendments were important in the current geopolitical situation.
“In the conditions of sanctions, this could become an additional stimulus for foreign companies,” he said.
Rosneft holds the 1st place in Russia and in the world by oil output and ranks 3rd in Russia in terms of natural gas extraction.
State-owned Rosneftegaz holds 69.5% of Rosneft shares while the British oil major BP possesses a 19.75% stake in Rosneft through BP Russian Investments Limited.
Rosneft posted a net profit of $4.3 billion in 2013.