Russian military delivers humanitarian aid to some 3,800 Syrians over past 24 hoursRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 27, 7:16
International talks on Syria conflict settlement may take up to several months - sourceWorld February 27, 7:13
PARNAS leader attacked during march in Nemtsov’s memorySociety & Culture February 26, 16:59
Donetsk water purification station recaptured from Ukrainian radicalsWorld February 26, 15:24
Russian skiers Ustyugov, Kryukov win team sprint at World ChampionshipsSport February 26, 15:23
Opposition activist Dadin sentenced for disorders at rallies leaves jailRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 26, 12:58
Aerospace Force chief says Russian army to get new combat jets and helicoptersMilitary & Defense February 26, 11:15
Mistura says Homs terror attacks attempt to derail Geneva talksWorld February 26, 5:49
Where to watch unique solar eclipse and spectacular ‘ring of fire’Science & Space February 26, 3:24
MOSCOW, July 01. /ITAR-TASS/. Rosneft is determined to assert its right to use the Power of Siberia pipeline for export to China in court, says the Russian oil and gas company’s release.
Rosneft is going “to assert the people’s right to a decent life through negotiations within corporate procedures in cooperation with the regulators and, if needed, in court”, goes the statement.
The statement quotes Gazprom’s chief executive Alexei Miller as saying that the pipeline in question and gas supplies to China will only be based on Gazprom resources.
“This position radically contravenes the goal of developing Siberia and Russia’s Far East and directly breaches the law,” says the statement. “Gazprom’s argument is that its gas transportation system is considered an instrument to fulfill the interests of its shareholders and investors in boosting sales and their efficiency, obviously referring to an allegedly similar position of Rosneft that refused to worsen positions of its shareholders in favor of the TNK BP holding’s minority shareholders.”
According to the oil major, Gazprom ignores the fact that it is not an equal market player but a monopoly that, besides advantages, has some liabilities to other players, some of these duties guaranteed by law.
Rosneft has been the most active lobbyist of giving access to the pipeline to independent producers. The company is negotiating annual 18 billion cubic meters supplies from its deposits in Eastern Siberia to the pipeline but Gazprom refuses to open Power of Siberia for other companies. “Strangely enough, Gazprom’s approach is based solely on the ownership of the unified gas transportation system,” said Rosneft president, Igor Sechin.
Possible access scenarios were discussed at the latest meeting of the presidential energy complex commission. Two options have been proposed, according to a participant.
One scenario is that Gazprom buys gas from independent producers at a price equal to the export price, less duty and transportation expenses. This would allow the holding to retain the pipeline monopoly.
The other option is for independent companies to establish a consortium to construct gas transportation infrastructure and boost supplies to China, so that Gazprom would probably rescind supply monopoly in this direction, the source told ITAR-TASS.
Expansion of the Russian gas transportation system is necessary to increase supplies to Asia Pacific. Miller and CNPC president Zhou Jiping signed the 30-year contract on 38 billion cubic meters gas export on May 21.“Independent producers say they are ready to export 20-30 billion cubic meters of gas a year to China,” said an official who participated in the meeting. “But the discussion of giving them access to the Eastern export route did not dispel uncertainty over whether their resource base can provide the necessary volumes over the long term.”
Neither Gazprom, nor China was ready to boost exports beyond those stipulated in the contract, he added.
Another source familiar with the discussion told ITAR-TASS an oil and gas consortium for construction of Eastern Gas Program pipelines on the basis of Power of Siberia was proposed by Sechin, who is also executive secretary of the presidential commission.