The highlights of 2017 FINA World ChampionshipsSport July 25, 19:37
IAAF to hear report on Russia’s reinstatement ahead of 2017 Athletics World ChampionshipSport July 25, 19:25
EU Council to discuss Nord Stream 2 project in SeptemberBusiness & Economy July 25, 19:13
Berlin preparing common European response to Siemens turbines supplies to Crimea — sourceBusiness & Economy July 25, 18:49
Finnish president: Dialog with Putin is direct and clearWorld July 25, 18:22
Summer surprises: Arctic swelters in heatwave, while resorts soak in rainBusiness & Economy July 25, 18:03
Sports minister says RUSADA doping inspectors started testing athletesSport July 25, 17:25
Arctic shelf development tops agenda of Murmansk international business weekBusiness & Economy July 25, 17:08
Trump backs investigation into Kiev’s meddling attempts to sabotage his election campaignWorld July 25, 16:57
MOSCOW, May 14. /ITAR-TASS/. Refusal of some foreign top managers to come to the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) under governments’ pressure will not affect the event’s economic section, believe the experts polled by the ITAR-TASS Political Analysis Center. In most cases, this will not hamper the economic ties of foreign businesses with Russia.
“What we see is rather a kind of defiant behavior than businesses' real response,” said political scientist, professor of the St. Petersburg State University Dmitry Gavra. A majority of those who decided to ignore the event will send less known proxies, he believes.
“There is a special term, GR [government relations], which describes business relations with the authorities,” said the expert. “It is a comprehensible curtsey that indicates business complies with political requirements and supports the government’s political course. At the same time, businesses are not going to abandon their economic interests and partners.”
In Europe, the top managers' swap for lower rank managers can even be politically approved, Gavra believes.
“This is exactly the reaction expected by leaders like François Hollande or Angela Merkel. They are well aware that cooperation with Russia means tax revenues, jobs, employment etc. Even here, Europe typically tries to have its cake and eat it,” he said.
Mikhail Portnoy who is in charge of international economic affairs at the Institute for the US and Canada Studies at the Russian Academy of Sciences also believes the forum’s economic section will not be affected.
“The situation is not as critical, because the businesses working in Russia on the basis of direct investments certainly do not want and cannot suddenly wind up their operations,” the expert said. “In all likelihood, they will formally obey the authorities’ request. Senior executives will refuse to come to send some workhorses instead.”
Portnoy is sure this will cause no principal interruptions to the forum’s work.
Experts believe the top Russian officials made the right decision to avoid refusing to visit the forum in this situation.
“First, it is important to send a signal to those players who will come, and this political signal is to be appreciated. Second, it is important to show that sanctions, non-attendance and so on are not as stinging a step to provoke our sharp reaction,” believes Gavra.
The forum will take place on May 22-24 under the motto “Building Trust in an Era of Change”. It will discuss risk management as a means to stimulate growth, and to tap Russia’s competitive potential, management of breakthrough technologies and adaptation to changing environment.