Activists in Berlin stage picket condemning Obama’s foreign policyWorld January 19, 21:17
Russian regulator promises to respond to any US restrictions of RT channelRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 19, 21:09
FIFA: Over 82,400 ticket requests applied globally for 2017 Confederations Cup in RussiaSport January 19, 20:17
Russia stands for developing legal tool to fight cyber hooliganismRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 19, 20:00
Russia is developing advanced hypersonic weapons — ministryMilitary & Defense January 19, 19:50
Former USSR leader receives Lithuanian court’s summons as witness in case over 1991 eventsWorld January 19, 19:29
FIDE chief says he plans to seek US entry after President-elect Trump’s inaugurationSport January 19, 18:56
Russian economy minister: Results of 2016 demonstrated adjustment to cheap oil, sanctionsBusiness & Economy January 19, 18:44
Russia ready to welcome Trump at economic forum in St. Petersburg — first deputy PMBusiness & Economy January 19, 18:29
MOSCOW, April 14. /ITAR-TASS/. Russian economic growth rate in 2014 will depend partially from developments in the Russian Republic of Crimea, Russian First Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov said in an interview with magazine Forbes on Monday.
“The World Bank forecasts more than 1% economic growth in the country,” he recalled, noting that “By the way, this is not worst scenario. We have more pessimistic assessments in the country. But I will not dare to give some tough forecasts.”
“The situation is changing,” Shuvalov said, noting that “We should decide how and from which reserves we will invest in socio-economic development in Crimea. Now we are considering funding of state programmes until the end of political cycle that is until 2018. After this I would make forecasts of further economic growth.”
The first deputy prime minister noted that debate was in progress in the government “between those who insist on higher state expenditures and those who want to have a more responsible macroeconomic policy.”
“There are two points of view about what is better: now to endure lower economic growth rate, but to reach a higher rate a little bit later or to boost growth now that will probably create more risks in the future,” he added.