Emelianenko-Mitrione bout postponed due to American’s illnessSport February 19, 4:06
OSCE unable to identify perpetrators of cyber attacks against it - secretary generalWorld February 19, 4:02
Russian biathletes win gold in relay at 2017 IBU World Championships in AustriaSport February 18, 18:30
Putin signs decree on recognition of documents given to Donbass peopleRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 18, 17:26
Sberbank CEO says no repeat of crisis in the short termBusiness & Economy February 18, 17:24
Judging by certain statements at Munich Conference, "cold war" is still not over — LavrovRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 18, 15:19
Bout’s lawyers will challenge Court of Appeals’ decision in Supreme Court on February 21Russian Politics & Diplomacy February 18, 7:16
Turkish Minister reproaches NATO for not fulfilling obligations on its south-eastern flankWorld February 18, 7:12
Moody's upgrades outlook on Russia’s sovereign rating to stable from negativeBusiness & Economy February 18, 2:37
LONDON, June 25. /ITAR-TASS reporter Alan Badov /. British organization human rights, Liberty, today filed a lawsuit against the country's security services. It demands an investigation into the legality of electronic surveillance, a denunciation of which appeared in a publication of former CIA officer Edward Snowden. This is the first lawsuit filed in the United Kingdom in connection with the data published by Snowden.
The request has been submitted to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, which defines the legal framework of British law enforcement and intelligence agencies.
Documents sent by Edward Snowden to media point to the fact that the electronic intelligence service of the UK - Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) is conducting a secret program called Tempora.
GCHQ intercepts all telephone and internet signals passing through the fiber-optic cables on British soil. The information is being stored and then security forces conduct search through the database by keywords.
British law on the powers of the investigation requires electronic surveillance to be carried out in respect of certain subscribers with the approval of the Ministry of Internal Affairs or the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. However, one of the articles of the law allows intercepting electronic communications without specifying a particular user, if they are conducted with foreign countries. Meanwhile, if all the electronic traffic is being indiscriminately exposed to tracking, conversations between callers in the UK inevitably fall in the hands of the intelligence.
In addition, the British electronic intelligence receives data from the American program of electronic surveillance PRISM. It is implemented by the NSA/CSS, including with regard to British callers.
Liberty asks the Investigatory Powers Tribunal to determine whether British intelligence services have being using PRISM and Tempora to get round the British legal procedures regulating access to personal data, as stated the organization.