UK media comes up with more ‘fake news’ about Russian football fansSport March 30, 17:49
Original images vs. portraits on canvas: An artist's eye versus the camera lensSociety & Culture March 30, 17:24
Putin thanks CNBC anchor for correctly setting Crimea apart from UkraineRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 30, 16:57
Putin says no plans to restrict rocket engine supplies to USScience & Space March 30, 16:49
Russia’s Space Force deploys high-tech space monitoring systemsMilitary & Defense March 30, 16:25
Putin stresses Russia’s military activities in Arctic threaten no oneRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 30, 16:18
Russia and Norway team up to clean Arctic of nuclear wasteWorld March 30, 16:10
Putin: Corruption must be fought against, but using this issue to score points is wrongRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 30, 16:07
Putin blasts 'worthless' allegations of 'Russian aggressiveness'Russian Politics & Diplomacy March 30, 15:57
CHISINAU, June 4 (Itar-Tass) - Moldova’s Constitutional Court has found unlawful the ban on the use of the Communist symbols - hammer and sickle - endorsed by parliament in 2012.
The bill was backed in July last year by most deputies of the ruling pro-European coalition consisting of Democrats, Liberals and Liberal-Democrats. It was introduced on the basis of the conclusions of the commission for the study of the totalitarian Communist regime. The commission was instituted by head of the Liberal party Mihai Ghimpu who had been interim president earlier.
The commission proposed to ban the use of Communist symbols in Moldova, to open a museum of “Soviet occupation” and to publish a school text-book about “crimes of Communists.”
Many experts assessed this as an attempt at pressure on the opposition Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova. The party disagreed with the Commission’s decision, finding it unconstitutional, and addressed an interpellation to the Constitutional Court.
It took judges of the Constitutional Court nine months to discuss the matter, even though in accordance with law they should have concluded it within six months since receiving the interpellation. Chairman of the Constitutional Court Alexander Tenase explained this by the need to consult the Venice Commission (the Council of Europe’s advisory body on law).
Having studied the Moldovan law, the Venice Commission arrived at the conclusion that the bill should be found unconstitutional and abrogated; otherwise, the Moldovan government stands to lose another case in the European Court of Human Rights.