Russian top diplomat shares his impressions from meeting with US leaderRussian Politics & Diplomacy July 21, 20:31
Lavrov bewildered US special services give no facts of Russia’s meddling in US electionRussian Politics & Diplomacy July 21, 19:46
Putin says USSR collapse had greatest impact on himSociety & Culture July 21, 18:37
Putin expects Russian-European Mars landing mission to crown with successScience & Space July 21, 18:21
Key facts about ExxonMobil and its business in RussiaBusiness & Economy July 21, 18:14
Nemtsov’s daughter appeals against verdict on her father’s murder with Supreme CourtSociety & Culture July 21, 18:03
Chinese Navy warships arrive in Russian Baltic port for joint drillsMilitary & Defense July 21, 17:57
This week in photos: Putin’s binoculars, Macron's hug and Berlin’s welcome for UK heirsSociety & Culture July 21, 17:43
Putin discloses his code name at intelligence schoolSociety & Culture July 21, 17:39
MOSCOW, May 29 (Itar-Tass) - The declaration of an embargo on supplying weapons to the Syrian opposition was originally a dubious step and its cancellation will complicate the situation and create hindrances to convening an international conference, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said in the wake of the EU’s decision not to prolong the ban on weapons supplies to the Syrian opposition.
“From the very beginning of this conflict we have repeatedly warned of the risk it may go international, but the flow of militants kept growing steadily from outside the country, including Libya, other North African countries, the Middle East, Europe and other regions,” Lavrov said. “Also, the flow of weapons to the militants increased, although providing weapons to non-government actors is illegitimate by international law.” In that connection he recalled a decision by the EU foreign ministers against prolonging the embargo on supplying weapons to the Syrian opposition.
“This poses rather serious questions. Firstly, under international law arms supplies to non-government actors are illegitimate. The international arms treaty the United Nations coordinated just recently - it was initiated by a number of EU member-states, including Britain - says, too, that arms supplies to non-government actors are impermissible, at least without the consent of the countries in whose territory those actors are present. Incidentally, the EU has an effective code of conduct in the sphere of arms export. That code imposes a direct ban on such supplies.”