Ex-Ukrainian president lambastes Europe for ‘brining Ukraine to its knees’World June 22, 17:12
Senator calls for tough response to Poland’s decision to demolish Red Army monumentsRussian Politics & Diplomacy June 22, 17:03
Putin to watch joining of Turkish Stream gas pipeline sectionsBusiness & Economy June 22, 16:16
Moscow hopes Saudi king’s visit to Russia will take place soonRussian Politics & Diplomacy June 22, 16:14
Poll reveals every second Russian sees no real external military threatSociety & Culture June 22, 15:35
French Foreign Ministry expresses regret over assault and robbery of Russian delegateWorld June 22, 15:22
Moscow expects Russia - NATO Council meeting to be held in JulyRussian Politics & Diplomacy June 22, 15:18
Jury to deliver verdict on Nemtsov murder case on June 27Society & Culture June 22, 15:12
‘Syria Tomorrow’ opposition leader counts on Russia’s role in settling crisisWorld June 22, 14:26
MOSCOW, February 11 (Itar-Tass) – Community Party MP Konstantin Shirshov, suspected by the Prosecutor General’s Office of involvement in a crime, has given up his parliamentary immunity voluntarily, the party’s faction in the State Duma said on Monday, February 11.
Shirshov submitted a petition containing such a request to State Duma speaker Sergei Naryshkin.
On January 23, the Duma received Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika’s request for stripping Shirshov of his immunity.
According to the materials the Prosecutor General’s Office received from the Investigation Committee, “Shirshov may be involved in a crime punishable under Article 30(3) and Article 159(4) of the Russian Criminal Code (unlawful attempt to take possession of other people’s property on a large scale, undertaken by a group of persons by preliminary agreement).”
Investigators claim that Shirshov was also involved in claiming 7.5 million euro for an MP’s mandate, the spokesperson for the Prosecutor General’s Office, Marina Gridneva, said.
Vladimir Yudin, head of a department within the Prosecutor General’s Office, said at a meeting of the Duma Rules Committee on January 25 that the case in which Shirshov was incriminated had been opened on July 8, 2011. The MP’s aides Myasin and Karagod are already facing penalties in the same case, he added.
“The crime boils down to the fact that the MP’s aides, together with Shirshov, had preliminary talks with Chernikov with the aim of getting money in a fraudulent way for having ostensibly been able to include him in the [United Russia party] list of the 6th Duma,” Yudin said.
After that Chernikov met with Myasuin and Karagod several times, and “the money changed hands at the National Hotel.” The transfer of the money in a hotel room was recorded by a video camera, Shirshov and the other persons who were with him were detained, the money was seized,” Yudin said.
He stressed that “Shirshov’s remarks are recorded in the video, and there is a recorded conversation between Myasin and Shirshov, who were discussing a meeting with Chernikov and the transfer of the money.”
According to Yudin, Karagod and Myasin cooperated with the investigation and “gave detailed testimony regarding the circumstances of the arrangement”, including the fact that “the amount of money was specified for their services as well.”
The verdict to Myasin and Karagod has already become effective and the issue at hand is to bring Shirshov to account. “Since the case has already been opened, we are raising the question of obtaining your consent for stripping him of his immunity,” Yudin said.
Shirshov flatly denied all charges.
Meanwhile, the Duma Rules Committee advised the lower house of parliament to strip Shirshov of his immunity. His fellow party member Duma First Deputy Speaker Ivan Melnikov said later that, in the opinion of the Communist Party leadership and taking into account the gravity of the charges brought against Shirshov, it would be necessary for him to think about resigning from the post of State Duma deputy voluntarily.”
The State Duma will consider stripping Shirshov of his immunity on February 13, Melnikov said on February 11, after a meeting of the lower house’s Council, which determines its agenda.