US court turns down Russia tycoon Deripaska’s libel suit against APWorld October 18, 4:13
Moscow court prolongs house arrest for director Serebrennikov to Jan 19, 2018World October 18, 1:11
Rusisan tennis star Sharapova comments on her performance in VTB Kremlin CupSport October 17, 19:29
Russia blacklists almost 400 football fansSport October 17, 18:48
Window for dialogue with Ukraine still open — diplomatRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 17, 18:40
Sharapova out of 2017 VTB Kremlin Cup in Moscow after 1st roundSport October 17, 18:35
Ten Russian universities included in Times Higher Education rankingSociety & Culture October 17, 18:00
Diplomat reveals foreign structures behind wave of fake ‘Russian embassy’ accountsRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 17, 16:57
Russian Guard, police may get electroshock shields for special operationsMilitary & Defense October 17, 16:41
DAVOS, Switzerland, January 23 (Itar-Tass) — Russia’s Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev declined to say in an interview with Bloomberg television straightforwardly if he believes in the possibility of renouncing the monopoly role played by the natural gas industry giant, OAO Gazprom.
“If this should be done, we should do a minute forecasting of all the aftermaths of the move,” Medvedev said. “This is possible in theory because we have independent suppliers of natural gas now but we mustn’t lose money.”
“That’s the main thing,” he said. “Money’s standing above other concerns and the rest is just talking.”
Medvedev recalled along with it that Gazprom is the largest supplier of natural gas, “which acts absolutely precisely on all of its contract commitments.”
“I think that’s very important for the European customers,” he said. “Its conduct is clear and predictable.”
Simultaneously with this, Medvedev leveled sharp criticism at the EU’s Third Energy Package.
“It exerts a destructive impact on the existing ties – both for Russia and for Gazprom, and it implies a renunciation of the previously signed agreements and the restructuring of the opportunities available at present,” he said. “We believe this is tantamount to an encroachment on the effective agreements and we’ll continue detailed discussions with our partners on the issue.”