Eurovision scrambles to ensure Russia’s participation in Kiev-hosted song contestSociety & Culture March 27, 11:41
Siberian ex-cop turned sadistic ‘werewolf’ serial killer charged with another 60 murdersSociety & Culture March 27, 11:25
NATO-Russia Council meeting on the horizon – diplomatRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 27, 11:06
Russia’s FSB detains gunmakers, seizes three aircraft gunsRussian Politics & Diplomacy March 27, 10:32
Russian, Tajik troops hold joint anti-terror drills in AsiaMilitary & Defense March 27, 9:11
US calls for release of detained participants in unsanctioned rallies across RussiaWorld March 27, 6:37
Russia conducts six humanitarian operations in Syria in 24 hoursSociety & Culture March 27, 6:34
Talks on banning nuclear weapons begin in UN without Russia, USWorld March 27, 6:28
Meeting with Putin of exceptional importance for Serbia — premierWorld March 27, 4:16
MOSCOW, December 26 (Itar-Tass) — Russian President Vladimir Putin will consider a bill in retaliation to the Magnitsky Act within two weeks after the Federation Council approves it and submits to the Kremlin for signature, presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov told Itar-Tass on Wednesday.
“In compliance with the law the president has two weeks to consider the document (after the Federation Council’s approval),” he said.
“It depends on the Federation Council when the bill is submitted to the president for signature,” Peskov said.
In reply to the question whether Putin takes a decision on signing or not signing the bill into law before the new year, he said, “We will see.”
On December 21, the lower house of Russian parliament adopted in the third and final reading the bill banning adoptions of Russian children by U.S. citizens and called for denouncing the Russian-U.S. agreement in this sphere.
The bill was supported by 420 parliamentarians, 7 voted against and one abstained.
The State Duma also approved visa and financial restrictions in relation to persons “who voted for a ban on the entry of Russian citizens to the U.S. and arrest of their assets over their involvement in violation of human rights.”