Investigators identify Ukrainians involved in shelling of Russia’s territory in 2014Russian Politics & Diplomacy December 06, 10:00
Putin approves Russia’s information security doctrineRussian Politics & Diplomacy December 06, 8:49
WSJ: Syrian army is about to retake militant-controlled east AleppoWorld December 06, 8:48
OSCE chief says trip to Crimea possible after consultations with Moscow and KievWorld December 06, 8:25
Erdogan signs bill to ratify Turkish Stream projectBusiness & Economy December 06, 8:19
Russia, India to hold joint naval drills on December 14-21Military & Defense December 06, 7:36
YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft team up to fight terrorism contentSociety & Culture December 06, 6:51
Russian hospital shelling 'cold-blooded murder' - Defense MinistryWorld December 06, 5:32
Some 100,000 Aleppo residents freed from rule of terrorists — Syria’s UN envoyWorld December 06, 5:04
MOSCOW, November 21 (Itar-Tass) — Leonid Razvozzhayev who is a defendant in the criminal case over the preparation of mass disorders, opened after the film “Anatomy of a Protest-2” was shown, is facing additional charges of robbery, spokesman for Russia’s Investigative Committee (SK) Vladimir Markin told Itar-Tass.
According to him, the charges have been brought in connection with a crime committed in Angarsk in 1997.
The case over the preparation mass disorders was opened against the Left Front movement leader Sergei Udaltsov, his assistant Konstantin Lebedev, and Leonid Razvozzhayev, an aide to member of the State Duma Ilya Ponomarev, after checking the facts shown in the film “Anatomy of a Protest-2.” According to the investigators, the footage shows a meeting of the opposition members with the head of the Committee on Defence and Security of the Georgian Parliament, Givi Targamadze, and the discussion of the issue related to the preparation of mass disorders in Russia with foreign funding.
Within the case Udaltsov has been released on recognisance not to leave, and Lebedev and Razvozzhayev were arrested. Charges have been brought against all the three. They could face up to five years in prison.