Russian athletes may take part in 2017 European championship under neutral flagSport December 05, 13:36
Talks between OPEC, non-OPEC members to be held on Dec 10 in ViennaBusiness & Economy December 05, 13:29
Lavrov says militants who do not leave eastern Aleppo to be regarded as terroristsRussian Politics & Diplomacy December 05, 13:20
Russia sees no need to establish military blocks in Asian-Pacific regionRussian Politics & Diplomacy December 05, 13:05
Press review: US pushes for new anti-Russia sanctions and Russia's military export in 2016Press Review December 05, 13:00
St. Petersburg University ranks 64th among Europe's best business schoolsSociety & Culture December 05, 12:59
Navy commander: Russia’s aircraft carrier-led group in Mediterranean is self-sufficientMilitary & Defense December 05, 12:55
Prosecutors to question lawyer representing ex-president of Ukraine over Maidan eventsWorld December 05, 12:32
Investigators seize documents from owner of Russian ship detained in AmsterdamMilitary & Defense December 05, 12:31
ST PETERSBURG, September 27 (Itar-Tass) —— St Petersbourg legislative assembly objected to the proposal to amend the Constitution of the Russian Federation to grant legal rights to fetuses. The proposal made by Vitaly Milonov, member of the United Russia faction, aims, above all, at banning abortion.
Most Petersburg lawmakers, at the Legislative Assembly’s meeting on Wednesday, voted against making such a proposal to the State Duma. Only seven MPs voted in favor, and three abstained.
Milonov intended to propose to the lower house of Russian parliament the new wording of part 2, Article 17 of Russia’s fundamental law to the effect that inalienable human rights and freedoms should start from the moment of the first heartbeat, that is when the fetus is still in the womb. Fundamental human rights, including the right to live, are so far acknowledged from the moment of birth. Some deputies said that should the amendment be adopted this would actually mean the ban on abortion and would cause a set of legal, ethical and medical problems.
Representatives of all parliamentary factions came out against the plan even before the voting. Speaker of the Legislative Assembly Vyacheslav Makarov, representative of the United Russia Party, remarked that the amendment had no chances at the federal level. “I do believe that raising this matter does nothing to augment the prestige of the Legislative Assembly. I am sure the deputies will not vote for this proposal,” he added.
“I hope we will not approach the federal authorities with such an initiative,” said Alexei Kovalyov, the head of A Just Russia faction. Konstantin Sukhenko of the LDRR, the head of the budget and finance committee of the Legislative Assembly, said, too, that “the decision will not be made today.”
Meanwhile Mikhail Brodsky, representative of St Petersburg governor in the Legislative Assembly, pointed out that it is “only ideologically” that the proposal is linked to banning abortion, which experts mention. Still it is impossible to amend this part of the Constitution by adopting some legislative act. It takes the decision of the Constitutional Assembly, which is impossible to convene as any operating bill on this body is lacking.
Milonov, in his turn, acknowledged that “the deputies’ reaction is predictable”, but he hopes that “this [proposal] will become the starting point for a broad public debate”. He believes that at present “there is no moral readiness to censure those who kill babies – this is psychologically uncomfortable.” Meanwhile, the MP said, according to official data only, some 40 million abortions were made in Russia in the past twenty years, which is comparable to the population of Ukraine.
Milonov earlier became the author of the municipal bill that established in St Petersburg from March 2012 administrative responsibility for propaganda of homosexuality and of other non-traditional forms of sex among minors, as well as for propaganda of pedophilia.