Putin and Erdogan give positive assessment to joint efforts in Astana processWorld October 21, 3:03
Privileges to certain languages in Ukraine’s education law to worsen situation — diplomatRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 20, 21:46
International balance of forces in Syria after Raqqa’s liberation unclear yet — expertMilitary & Defense October 20, 21:05
Russia to resume import of aubergines, pomegranates from Turkey since October 30Business & Economy October 20, 20:18
International station to orbit Moon at 70,000 km distance from EarthScience & Space October 20, 20:09
US indulging in lies to have UN-OPCW mission’s mandate extended — Foreign MinistryRussian Politics & Diplomacy October 20, 19:31
This week in photos: Diplomatic kiss, Paddington's dance and French bank in flamesSociety & Culture October 20, 17:46
Scientific team unlocks secret to supercaps’ vast capacity as ‘the battery of the future’Science & Space October 20, 17:40
Russian economy’s losses from cyber threats may surge fourfold in two yearsBusiness & Economy October 20, 16:52
BRUSSELS, April 25 (Itar-Tass) — Plans regarding the antiballistic missile system in Europe remain the major unresolved issue marring relations between NATO and Russia, General Nikolai Makarov, the Chief of General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces said here Wednesday.
“The phased adaptive approach that is being implemented in Europe today may upset the balance in the field of security by 2017 or 2018,” he said.
He indicated that the most recent computerized war game simulation conducted by Russian and NATO experts showed the two sides stand to gain the best possible results in the field of antimissile missile defenses if they create a united missile defense system.
“Quite a big amount of time was spent today to analyze the results of the war games simulation held in Germany at the end of March,” Gen Makarov said. “The simulation had three scenarios, the first imitating the action of two fully independent systems, the second scenario presupposing a situation where the sides would have independent combat control and firepower and a united block of information elements, and the third scenario envisioning a fully integrated missile defense system.”
“All the parties involved in the simulation confirmed that the third scenario showed the best results,” he said.
Gen Makarov pointed out the fact that Russia had managed to convince the NATO partners to hold the simulation on the basis of its proposals.
“In the first place, it was Europe that was chosen as a theater of operations, not a hypothetical third country,” he said. “Secondly, all the parameters of the antimissile missile systems were had the closest possible resemblance to the actually existing ones.”
“A big number of NATO countries proposed to organize similar war game simulations on their territories,” Gen Makarov said.