Press review: Trump terrifies Western elites and Alibaba eyes partnership with SberbankPress Review January 18, 13:00
Kremlin knows nothing about Snowden’s intentionsRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 12:50
Russian lawmaker: McCain confirms US recognizes Russia’s growing world roleRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 12:42
Kremlin: Issue on Crimea status not matter of discussion for MoscowRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 12:31
Russia views Austria’s OSCE chairmanship program as pragmaticRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 12:16
New movie marks return of Russian cinema to India’s silver screens after 25-year hiatusSociety & Culture January 18, 12:09
Senator says Russia should not abide by ECHR ruling on adoption ban for USRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 18, 12:00
Stunning Miss Universe 2017 candidatesSociety & Culture January 18, 11:46
Chinese Foreign Ministry: Beijing ready to boost cooperation with MoscowWorld January 18, 11:11
BRUSSELS, April 25 (Itar-Tass) — Plans regarding the antiballistic missile system in Europe remain the major unresolved issue marring relations between NATO and Russia, General Nikolai Makarov, the Chief of General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces said here Wednesday.
“The phased adaptive approach that is being implemented in Europe today may upset the balance in the field of security by 2017 or 2018,” he said.
He indicated that the most recent computerized war game simulation conducted by Russian and NATO experts showed the two sides stand to gain the best possible results in the field of antimissile missile defenses if they create a united missile defense system.
“Quite a big amount of time was spent today to analyze the results of the war games simulation held in Germany at the end of March,” Gen Makarov said. “The simulation had three scenarios, the first imitating the action of two fully independent systems, the second scenario presupposing a situation where the sides would have independent combat control and firepower and a united block of information elements, and the third scenario envisioning a fully integrated missile defense system.”
“All the parties involved in the simulation confirmed that the third scenario showed the best results,” he said.
Gen Makarov pointed out the fact that Russia had managed to convince the NATO partners to hold the simulation on the basis of its proposals.
“In the first place, it was Europe that was chosen as a theater of operations, not a hypothetical third country,” he said. “Secondly, all the parameters of the antimissile missile systems were had the closest possible resemblance to the actually existing ones.”
“A big number of NATO countries proposed to organize similar war game simulations on their territories,” Gen Makarov said.