WSJ: Syrian army is about to retake militant-controlled east AleppoWorld December 06, 8:48
OSCE chief says trip to Crimea possible after consultations with Moscow and KievWorld December 06, 8:25
Erdogan signs bill to ratify Turkish Stream projectBusiness & Economy December 06, 8:19
Russia, India to hold joint naval drills on December 14-21Military & Defense December 06, 7:36
YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft team up to fight terrorism contentSociety & Culture December 06, 6:51
Russian hospital shelling 'cold-blooded murder' - Defense MinistryWorld December 06, 5:32
Some 100,000 Aleppo residents freed from rule of terrorists — Syria’s UN envoyWorld December 06, 5:04
Over 1,000 Syrian settlements join reconciliation process - Russian defense ministryWorld December 06, 3:27
Italian president asks Renzi to delay resignation until budget passedWorld December 06, 3:24
MOSCOW, March 27 (Itar-Tass) — Criminal charges against the former chief of the Moscow Metro underground railway service, Dmitry Gayev, who was suspected of illegally obtaining 112 million roubles as compensation for the use of a fare system he patented, have been dropped, the Investigation Department of the Russian Interior Ministry told Itar-Tass on Monday.
The case against Gayev was opened under Article 201 of the RF Criminal Code - abuse of authority. The reason for its opening was a pre-investigation check of materials from the RF Prosecutor General’s Office.
He resigned in 2011 after allegations of fraud and embezzlement came to light. Gayev had been accused of illegally patenting the electronic subway tickets used today that replaced tokens in 1999 and receiving 112 million roubles in patent proceeds over the following 11 years.
“During the investigation, the Investigation Department found that in 1998, Gayev in collaboration with other persons got a patent for the invention named “the automated system of fare collection and verification of travel documents” that was introduced in the Moscow metro a year earlier,” the department reported. “During the investigation, the conclusions of experts in various fields of law were made from which it was established that Gayev had the right to act as a patent holder conclude a license agreement, in accordance with which he was paid 112 million roubles as a reward.”
Gayev’s lawyer Alexander Asnis stated for his part that he was fully satisfied with the conclusions of the investigation. “This is what we sought during the year of the investigation,” he said, noting that the investigation has only confirmed that Gayev “lawfully received compensations under the license agreement.”