Deal on Russian Hmeymim, Tartus bases deployment in Syria to be in force for 49 yearsMilitary & Defense January 20, 16:51
Polar region to allocate almost 50 million rubles for small business supportBusiness & Economy January 20, 15:55
First Deputy PM: Western investors in Davos believe 2017 will be good year for RussiaBusiness & Economy January 20, 15:49
Kremlin says Syrian army keeps plans to liberate Palmyra from Islamic StateRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 20, 15:43
India plans to install Russian security system at Maharashtra portMilitary & Defense January 20, 15:32
Lavrov on IS destroying Palmyra monuments: barbarians are barbariansRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 20, 15:24
Russia hopes Trump administration will send Mideast expert to Astana talksRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 20, 15:18
Top diplomat: Main task in Syrian settlement is to resume talks, involve armed oppositionRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 20, 15:11
Russian expert predicts Trump will adopt more pragmatic approach on Syria policyRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 20, 15:01
MOSCOW, February 8 (Itar-Tass) — Prosecutor General's Office representative Larisa Stepanova asked the Supreme Court to uphold the decision by the Central Election Commission (CEC) to deny registration to Grigory Yavlinsky as a candidate in the presidential election.
"I ask not to meet the plaintiff's demand," Stepanov said at a session of the Supreme Court on Wednesday.
The law clearly states that the information on voters must be entered by hand, and that in case of entering the information by other means, the signatures are invalidated.
She reminded that the testimony of the experts in court shows that the photos of handwritten lists cannot be regarded as valid, and, therefore, their annulment was legitimate.
There court has no reasons to believe that the CEC, while denying registration to Yavlinsky, misconstrued the law.
CEC member Dmitry Voronin supported this position. He noted that electrography is a copy, not the original of a document. The law clearly defines the registration procedure, especially for presidential election.
"There has not been a single case in the entire history of elections where copies were offered instead of signature lists; they might be called "clones," but they were not the originals anyway," Voronin underlined.
The CEC representative said that after a check of signatures in support of Yavlinsky's candidacy, two more fake signatures were exposed: "the first in the Orel region, where a notary’s signature was faked and the second case is that I found my own signature which I never put."
Of the two million signatures, the CEC auditors selected 600,000, of which 153,938 were recognized as invalid.
Yavlinsky's representative Boris Moiseyev claimed that the CEC had misinterpreted the regulations on signature lists. "Neither the election law, nor the law on the basic guarantees of voting rights contain a ban on the use of /signature/ lists in electronic form. Even the Federal Tax Service has used electronic forms for accountability since the beginning of this year," Moiseyev insisted.
However, Moiseyev could not answer where the originals of the signature lists were.