Funds for exploration of Moon, Mars should be raised abroad — RoscosmosScience & Space January 24, 11:58
Syria talks in Astana to end on Tuesday — sourceWorld January 24, 11:50
Syrian opposition says no plans to sign Astana meeting communiqueWorld January 24, 10:34
Astana talks may continue on Wednesday, Syrian opposition saysWorld January 24, 9:14
Syria peace talks in Astana enter second dayWorld January 24, 8:52
China deploys intercontinental missiles near Russian border — mediaWorld January 24, 7:58
Russian army engineers defuse almost 500 improvised explosives in eastern AleppoMilitary & Defense January 24, 6:56
Printing house in Kiev releases map of Ukraine leaving out CrimeaWorld January 24, 4:34
Title for Episode VIII of world’s famous saga ‘Star Wars’ revealedSociety & Culture January 23, 21:19
MOSCOW, January 25 (Itar-Tass) — Russia’s Investigation Committee (SK) will conduct an inquiry into the appearance in the Internet of a video of a conversation of member of A Just Russia party Gennady Gudkov and oppositionist Vladimir Ryzhkov, SK spokesman Vladimir Markin told Itar-Tass.
“The SK Main Investigation Department for Moscow conducts pre-investigation checks in connection with the appearance of the video,” he added.
The video clip showing as Gudkov and Ryzhkov meet in a cafe appeared on the Web several days ago. One can see that during the discussion of preparations for another rally they also touch upon the future of A Just Russia. Gudkov and Ryzhkov discuss who of them in the future will head the party without its leader Sergei Mironov.
The leader of A Just Russia himself believes that this video is authentic, but argues that “there is no any split in the party.” According to Mironov, he “has already talked to Gudkov and told him that this is not a friendly conduct.”
Earlier, audio records of talks of another opposition leader Boris Nemtsov appeared on the Internet. In this connection, the RF Investigative Committee is also conducting a probe. The SK said that the PARNAS (People's Freedom Party) leader has failed to come to the investigator, although claims that the probe was conducted improperly.