Passenger plane crashes in CubaWorld April 29, 22:49
US anti-missile systems in Eastern Europe violate INF Treaty - Russian foreign ministryRussian Politics & Diplomacy April 29, 20:35
Moscow police say 250 people take part in protest rallyWorld April 29, 16:29
Abe plans to continue dialogue with Putin to solve global issuesWorld April 29, 14:50
Moscow is ready to cooperate with Washington on Syria — LavrovRussian Politics & Diplomacy April 29, 12:24
Diplomat calls US’ allegations about isolation of Russia in UN 'strange'Russian Politics & Diplomacy April 28, 20:58
Experts say Russian hackers strongly demonized in USRussian Politics & Diplomacy April 28, 20:35
Ferrari drivers clock best time in Practice Two of Russia F1 GP in SochiSport April 28, 19:54
Red Bull’s advisor Marko says Kvyat to possibly remain with Toro Rosso next yearSport April 28, 19:16
KIEV, January 24 (Itar-Tass) —— The Ukrainian Constitutional Court has ruled that the collection, storing, use and distribution of confidential information about individuals without their consent is an interference in personal and family life, which is permitted exclusively in the cases defined by the law and in the interests of national security, economic well being and human rights.
Constitutional Court Chairman Anatoly Golovin announced the decision on Tuesday.
The Court has thus given an interpretation of certain articles of the Ukrainian constitution by request of the Zhashkovsky district council in the Cherkassy region, which asked to explain the essence of information about personal and family life and to say whether such information was confidential.
From now on, Ukrainian journalists, who often write about the personal life of politicians and businessmen without their consent, would be fined from $1,000 to over $2,000 or sentenced up to two years of correctional labor or an arrest of up to six months of an imprisonment of up to three years. If the offense repeats, such journalists may be imprisoned for up to five years.
Journalists are given an opportunity to prove their innocence. Article 29 of the Law on Information says that the journalist may be pronounced not guilty if the disclosed information has public significance, which outweighs the potential damage.