Title for Episode VIII of world’s famous saga ‘Star Wars’ revealedSociety & Culture January 23, 21:19
Russia’s chief negotiator: Astana format gives hope for new level in negotiating processRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 23, 20:52
Astana talks focusing on mechanism of Syria ceasefire observance — oppositionWorld January 23, 20:23
Russia and Turkey hit Islamic State targets near al-Bab in Aleppo provinceWorld January 23, 20:06
Russia’s 4th Yasen-class submarine completes hydraulic testsMilitary & Defense January 23, 18:56
Arctic airport in search for investorsBusiness & Economy January 23, 18:50
Rosneft begins Arctic shelf’s seismological exploration from 2017Business & Economy January 23, 18:38
Tesla takes the lead in sales of electric cars in Russia in 2016Business & Economy January 23, 18:18
Politician says European-style reforms to degrade Ukraine’s economyWorld January 23, 18:16
CHISINAU, November 30 (Itar-Tass) —— The United States and the European Union exerted pressure on Moldovan President Vladimir Voronin in November 2003 to make him sign a memorandum on Transdniestria settlement drafted with the assistance of Dmitry Kozak, a deputy Kremlin chief of staff at that time.
U.S. diplomat William Hilll, who head the OSCE Mission in Chisinau back then, said in an interview with the Moldovan newspaper Kommersant md published on Wednesday, November 30.
According to Hill, Voronin refused to sign the memorandum because of an article concerning Russia’s military presence in Transdniestria.
The United States, EU and OSCE officials objected to the military presence that had not been discussed with the other parties to the Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty.
Having learnt of three new articles concerning Russia’s military presence in Transdniestria, Voronin was telephoned and instructed not to sign the memorandum, the diplomat said.
In his opinion, the very fact that all interested sides did not participate in the drafting of the document was a serious obstacle to its signing and eventually left it unsigned.
There was not full understanding and trust, he added.
At the same time, Hill believes that the principle of federative system in Moldova proposed in the Kozak Memorandum can provide a proper basis for a good resolution of the Transdniestrian problem.
All of the OSCE countries have been discussing the idea of federalisation for a long time, since 1993, but it is hard to implement now, and time and effort are needed on the part of all mediators and parties to the talks.
Hill said one should not expect quick results from the “5+2” Transdniestrian talks that resumed in Vilnius on November 30.
There have been no official negotiations for more than five years and there have been only a few unofficial contacts. The parties need to resume the dialogue and build trust, the diplomat said.
He regretted that the current situation surrounding the talks is more complex than it was in 2003.