Russia's Rostec to sell 12% in Russian Helicopters to investors consortiumBusiness & Economy February 20, 15:53
Four Russian servicemen killed in car blast in SyriaRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 20, 15:46
Russian ammo maker to develop AI-based grenade launcher munitionsMilitary & Defense February 20, 15:44
Russia holds talks on sales of T-90-MS tanks to Middle East statesMilitary & Defense February 20, 15:29
Most Russians back continuation of humanitarian aid to Donbass — pollSociety & Culture February 20, 15:13
Turkey may be interested in buying Russian S-400 missile systemsMilitary & Defense February 20, 14:40
Value of S-300 contract with Iran reaches almost $1 blnMilitary & Defense February 20, 14:08
Lavrov blasts claims of Russia’s 'involvement' in Montenegro coup attempt as groundlessRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 20, 13:55
Kremlin: Putin’s decree on recognition of LPR and DPR passports signed on humanity groundsRussian Politics & Diplomacy February 20, 13:42
MOSCOW, November 17 (Itar-Tass) — The chief of the Russian General Staff levelled criticism on some models of Russian military hardware, noting that these weapons are inferior to the most successful foreign weapons in their tactical and technical characteristics.
General Nikolai Makarov cited the following data at the hearings in the Public Chamber : the fire range of the Israeli tank Merkava MK4 makes six kilometres, whereas the fire range of the Russian tank T-90 – only 2.5 kilometres. The US rocket artillery system HIMARS (High Mobility Artillery Rocket System) hits the targets at a distance of 150 kilometres, and the fire range of the Russian artillery rocket system makes 70 kilometres.
The service life of Russian optical electronic reconnaissance satellites makes from three to five years, while their foreign counterparts “live” on the orbit for 15 years. “So, we should produce them more frequently, spending the money of taxpayers,” the chief of the General Staff said.
Modern military hardware should ensure a high level of defence on the battlefield, Makarov said with confidence. “We should produce military hardware, in the use of which the crew would stay alive in any case,” he underlined.