Russian space budget may grow this yearScience & Space May 26, 20:48
Moscow hopes London High Court will deliver judgement on Ukraine’s debt to Russia soonBusiness & Economy May 26, 20:21
Hungarian top diplomat: EU must discuss anti-Russian sanctionsWorld May 26, 19:56
Russian, French top diplomats discuss preparations for Putin’s visit to FranceRussian Politics & Diplomacy May 26, 19:47
Moscow comments on Tallinn’s move to expel Russian diplomatsRussian Politics & Diplomacy May 26, 19:43
WADA: Legendary Isinbayeva suits role of ambassador for clean sports in RussiaSport May 26, 19:33
Russia working on advanced air defense systemMilitary & Defense May 26, 19:17
WADA receives Russia’s new national anti-doping planSport May 26, 19:14
Moldova’s ruling pro-European coalition breaks upWorld May 26, 19:12
MOSCOW, November 17 (Itar-Tass) — The chief of the Russian General Staff levelled criticism on some models of Russian military hardware, noting that these weapons are inferior to the most successful foreign weapons in their tactical and technical characteristics.
General Nikolai Makarov cited the following data at the hearings in the Public Chamber : the fire range of the Israeli tank Merkava MK4 makes six kilometres, whereas the fire range of the Russian tank T-90 – only 2.5 kilometres. The US rocket artillery system HIMARS (High Mobility Artillery Rocket System) hits the targets at a distance of 150 kilometres, and the fire range of the Russian artillery rocket system makes 70 kilometres.
The service life of Russian optical electronic reconnaissance satellites makes from three to five years, while their foreign counterparts “live” on the orbit for 15 years. “So, we should produce them more frequently, spending the money of taxpayers,” the chief of the General Staff said.
Modern military hardware should ensure a high level of defence on the battlefield, Makarov said with confidence. “We should produce military hardware, in the use of which the crew would stay alive in any case,” he underlined.