Russian, French scientists study permafrost lakes in ArcticBusiness & Economy January 16, 18:09
Russian top doplomat calls upon leaders of Palestine’s parties to compromiseRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 16, 18:06
Siberian scientists to study Arctic 'anchor points' for development of Northern Sea RouteBusiness & Economy January 16, 17:57
IAC specialists join investigation of Tu-154 crash near SochiWorld January 16, 17:48
Russia’s top court to announce decision on Yukos case on January 19Business & Economy January 16, 17:19
Hundreds of mourners pay last respects to Aleksandrov Ensemble's conductorSociety & Culture January 16, 17:08
Poroshenko instructs ministry to file lawsuit against Russia to UN International CourtWorld January 16, 16:44
Moscow interested in talks on nuclear weapons with US without tying them to sanctionsRussian Politics & Diplomacy January 16, 16:44
Expert says Trump will focus just as much on Ukraine as ObamaWorld January 16, 16:12
MOSCOW, November 17 (Itar-Tass) — The chief of the Russian General Staff levelled criticism on some models of Russian military hardware, noting that these weapons are inferior to the most successful foreign weapons in their tactical and technical characteristics.
General Nikolai Makarov cited the following data at the hearings in the Public Chamber : the fire range of the Israeli tank Merkava MK4 makes six kilometres, whereas the fire range of the Russian tank T-90 – only 2.5 kilometres. The US rocket artillery system HIMARS (High Mobility Artillery Rocket System) hits the targets at a distance of 150 kilometres, and the fire range of the Russian artillery rocket system makes 70 kilometres.
The service life of Russian optical electronic reconnaissance satellites makes from three to five years, while their foreign counterparts “live” on the orbit for 15 years. “So, we should produce them more frequently, spending the money of taxpayers,” the chief of the General Staff said.
Modern military hardware should ensure a high level of defence on the battlefield, Makarov said with confidence. “We should produce military hardware, in the use of which the crew would stay alive in any case,” he underlined.