Russian singer barred from Eurovision believes she still has chancesSociety & Culture March 23, 8:41
Chain of explosions reported from ammunition depot in UkraineWorld March 23, 8:15
Number of lethal casualties in London terror attack rises to fourWorld March 23, 4:46
Putin proposes extending term of Russia's Central Bank chiefBusiness & Economy March 22, 21:49
Mayor says investigation into London attack is underwayWorld March 22, 21:16
Ukrainian radicals urge Poroshenko to nationalize Russian banks’ subsidiariesBusiness & Economy March 22, 20:51
Peru is back on 2018 Dakar Rally track alongside with Bolivia, ArgentinaSport March 22, 20:08
Three dead, twenty injured in London attack — policeWorld March 22, 19:59
Stadium in Russia's Dagestan to be named after pole-vault queen IsinbayevaSport March 22, 19:19
MOSCOW, October 26 (Itar-Tass) — The Russian state authorities should support the innovations actively not only in material terms, but also providing comfortable conditions for the development and introduction of new technologies, President of the Skolkovo Foundation Viktor Vekselberg said at the International Forum of Nanotechnologies on Wednesday.
“We are indirectly aware that developed countries allocate about 4-5% of GDP for the development of high technologies, but we allocate only about two percent of GDP that is obviously insufficient,” he noted. “The money is an important instrument of state support, but not the only one,” Vekselberg pointed out. He elaborated that the state authorities can support the nanoindustry thanks to regulating measures, state order, standards and etc.
The Skolkovo Foundation president noted that in the implementation of high-technological projects “it is important that the industry, in which they are introduced, provides comfortable conditions for businesspeople, scientists and researchers and they do not seek to realize their ideas abroad, but work in our country.”
RUSNANO chief Anatoly Chubais noted that “the task of the state authorities is not to replace private business, but to help it.” “The state control over innovative institutes should differ absolutely from an ordinary state control,” he pointed out. Chubais elaborated that each venture project is fraught with very high risks. In case of the total state control we will just get intimidated officials and intimidated business, which will not be able to realize anything seeking for the targets to be fulfilled and all standards to be observed. Meanwhile, the RUSNANO chief emphasized that he realized during his work in the corporation that “Russian innovative business can bring real revenues.”