Mistura says Homs terror attacks attempt to derail Geneva talksWorld February 26, 5:49
Annular eclipse will be visible in South America, Africa on Feb 26Science & Space February 26, 3:24
HNC expects Trump to correct Obama's mistakes in Syria - delegation headWorld February 26, 3:08
War on terror to dominate Geneva talks — Syrian UN envoyWorld February 25, 23:48
Russian skier wins gold in skiathlon at 2017 FIS Nordic World Ski ChampionshipsSport February 25, 17:46
Top US Air Force general points to growing conflict potential in Syrian airspaceWorld February 25, 17:17
Iran relies on Russia’s support in production of fuel for nuclear power plantsBusiness & Economy February 25, 16:20
Ukrainian military capture Donetsk water purification plant — spokesmanWorld February 25, 15:05
Azerbaijan and Armenia report armed clashes in Karabakh conflict areaWorld February 25, 11:45
MOSCOW, October 21 (Itar-Tass) —— Russia’s Central Election Commission (CEC) said on Friday Prime Minister Vladimir Putin had violated no election law delivering his speech at a congress of the ruling United Russia (UR) party on September 24.
According to earlier media reports, head of the legal service of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF) Vadim Solovyov appealed to the Central Election Commission and the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office against Putin’s illegal canvassing in favour of United Russia at the party congress. The speech was aired by all federal-level TV channels, although Putin does not run for a seat in the State Duma lower parliament house.
“Canvassing by state officials is not entirely prohibited. State officials are prohibited to engage in canvassing while performing their duties. It means that if a state official is not performing his or her duties he or she is allowed to do it,” Maya Grishina, a member of the Central Election Commission, told journalists.
Speaking about the United Russia congress, she noted that it was held on a weekend day, or a day off, when Putin was not performing his office duties.
She also noted that media “footage of current activities of state officials has nothing to do with the coverage of the election campaign.”