Russia hopes Astana talks on Syria will yield package of documents on de-escalation zonesRussian Politics & Diplomacy June 25, 20:31
Russians’ real incomes up by 3% in May - Russian finance ministerBusiness & Economy June 25, 18:39
All doping tests of Russian players at 2014 FIFA World Cup are negativeSport June 25, 15:10
Police refrains from calling Newcastle incident a terrorist attackWorld June 25, 13:14
Putin offers condolences to Pakistan’s president over fire victimsRussian Politics & Diplomacy June 25, 12:39
Fire of fuel tank kills 123 people in Pakistan - TVWorld June 25, 7:58
Muslims worldwide celebrate Eid al-FitrSociety & Culture June 25, 5:18
Mexico knocks out Russia from FIFA Confederations Cup with 2-1 win in KazanSport June 24, 19:59
Putin visits Crimean youth camp ArtekSociety & Culture June 24, 19:42
WASHINGTON, October 20 (Itar-Tass) —— The British authorities have no official report on the causes of former Federal Security Service (FSB) officer Alexander Litvinenko’s death and they cannot be sure his death was violent, William Dunkerley, an independent media analyst and consultant to media organizations internationally, said.
In 2007, he made a report on how the Litvinenko case was covered by mass media. Now he is publishing a book titled “The Phony Litvinenko Murder”.
While working on his new book on Litvinenko’s death, Dunkerley got in touch with the British coroner who is investigating the case.
“In connection with my forthcoming book, “The Phony Litvinenko Murder” (Omnicom Press), I contacted the coroner's office seeking clarification. I wrote:
“Based on my present understanding, I will report:
“‘As of now, the coroner has not determined that Litvinenko's death was a homicide. Indeed, no certification has been issued as to the cause and manner of death.’
“If that contains any inaccuracies, please correct me. Thanks.”
And the coroner’s office responded:
“William, that is correct. Thanks for seeking clarification.”
“That means it's not really settled that Litvinenko's death was a homicide or that he died from polonium poisoning,” Dunkerley says.
He noted that there has never been a definitive determination that Alexander Litvinenko was murdered. However both the British and American press state otherwise even though there is a “Declaration of Principles on the Conduct of Journalists” that is promulgated by the International Federation of Journalists. It states:
“The journalist shall report only in accordance with facts of which he/she knows the origin.”
“Given that, there seems to be a number of journalists covering the Litvinenko story who may be guilty of journalistic malfeasance,” Dunkerley writes.
The British authorities claim that Russian business Andrei Lugovoi is responsible for Litvinenko’s death.
If Britain gave Russia the proof that Russian MP Lugovoi killed Litvinenko in London in 2006 by poisoning him with radioactive polonium-210, Russia would study it, the spokesman for the Russian Embassy in London, Konstantin Shlykov, said, responding to media reports.
“First of all, the statement that Mr. Litvinenko was killed by way of execution ordered by the state and orchestrated by Russia is not backed up by evidence. And we are confident that no such evidence has ever existed. Otherwise, it would have been given to us,” Shlykov said in a letter to The Sundy Times that published an article titled “Russia Murdered Litvinenko, Says Top Prosecutor” on October 2.
“Second, when the author says that Russia refuses to extradite Lugovoi who allegedly killed Mr. Litvinenko, he [the author of the article] did not bother to mention that according to its constitutional norms Russia does not extradite its citizens to other countries for court investigations on their territory, irrespective whether it is Lugovoi or someone else. However, using this trick the author tries to create the impression that the Russian state is sort of ‘covering up’ for Mr. Lugovoi. But this is not true. If the British investigation bodies have well grounded proof of Lugovoi’s guilt, Russian law enforcement agencies are ready to study them. However no arguments to this effect have been presented since Litvinenko’s assassination in London Moreover, the British authorities rejected the benefit of questioning Mr. Lugovoi in Russia. And he, by the way, has repeatedly said publicly that he is ready to answer questions in this case. It would be legitimate to ask why [the British side rejected such an opportunity],” the spokesman said.
“Third, the Russian side has repeatedly requested the medical certificate of Mr. Litvinenko’s death. But this document was never provided, which can only be regretted. Russian law enforcement agencies are still waiting for it,” Shlykov said.
Litvinenko died of polonium 210 poisoning at a London hospital in November 2006.
Earlier, the Hamburg prosecutor's office dropped all charges Russian businessmen Dmitry Kovtun who was one of the suspects in the case.
Kovtun was suspected of having transported radionuclides across Germany. “Justice has prevailed at last, and I has been fully rehabilitated,” Kovtun said on Wednesday. “I have always believed that justice will prevail just as it will prevail in respect of Andrei Lugovoi who has been charged by British authorities.”
“The case against me and against Andrei Lugovoi was a bit too thin and doctored up by certain circles in England, and, as German experience shows, fell apart like a snowball when examined impartially,” Kovtun said.
He said a special unit called “The Third Man” had been created in Germany to investigate his case. "This is a big unit and it was busy all the time looking for the third mythical man who was supposedly seen with me in Germany,” he said, adding, “It's clear now where that search has led to.”
“As a lawyer I can say that for Britain this means some new circumstances that do not support their position at all,” Romashov said.
British investigators consider Lugovoi to be the main suspect in the case, but he flatly denies all charges.
Lugovoi dismissed as absurd the BBC's assertion that he could have killed Litvinenko unintentionally.
“I am not a small and naive boy. I am too professional and experienced in security matters to be used on the sly,” Lugovoi said.
“I am a professional and I will not allow anyone to use me. This assertion is absurd in terms of common sense. But politically, it benefits British secret services and the real murders of Litvinenko,” the deputy said.
In the summer 2007 British prosecutors demanded Lugovoi's extradition as the main suspect in the Litvinenko murder case. The businessman emphatically denied the charges.
He also said that polonium traces were found in London at places that he did not visit. “The polonium traces: were found 30 days after my stay in London, but polonium is not fingerprints, and it is impossible to identify who left these traces,” Lugovoi stressed.
A number of other polonium-contaminated objects were found, “but I don' t have any relation to them,” Lugovoi said.