Putin venerates St Nicholas's relics in Cathedral of the SaviorSociety & Culture May 24, 21:53
Putin points out Russia’s good relations with EgyptRussian Politics & Diplomacy May 24, 21:30
Ukraine names conditions for Minsk accords' political part implementationWorld May 24, 20:44
Blaze-stricken Siberian areas expecting downpours that may quash firesSociety & Culture May 24, 19:45
Contact Group on Ukraine proposes more areas of disengagementWorld May 24, 19:39
Russian Emergencies Ministry says over 70 homes burn down in SiberiaSociety & Culture May 24, 18:49
International Chekhov Theater festival opens its doors for 13th time in MoscowSociety & Culture May 24, 18:44
Putin decorates commandoes for two-day face-to-face clash with militants in SyriaRussian Politics & Diplomacy May 24, 18:31
Experts say rising military spending to push Europe to reconsider NATO’s roleRussian Politics & Diplomacy May 24, 17:56
KIEV, September 6 (Itar-Tass) —— Members of the parliament faction of Ukraine’s opposition Batkivshchyna party led by ex-prime minister Yulia Timoshenko on Tuesday left the parliament as soon as Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich arrived there to speak at the opening ceremony of the new parliament session. The move is designed to demonstrate their protest against Timoshenko’s arrest and trial.
The opposition faction members appeared in the parliament building wearing black T-shirts decorated with slogans reading “Freedom to Ukraine,” and “Batkivshchyna Above All” and photos of their leader, Yulia Timoshenko, behind bars. “We want to show our attitude to the trials that are in progress at Ukrainian courts,” lawmaker Sergei Vlasenko told journalists.
Ex-prime minister Yulia Timoshenko is facing charges of abuse of office while concluding gas agreements with Russia in 2009. The prosecution accuses Timoshenko of acting in excess of her powers and giving directives for signing a gas contract with Russia in 2009 without the government’s consent. As a result, gas prices in Ukraine increased, but the tariff for transit, pegged to the price of gas, did not change, which caused damage to the budget in the amount of about 200 million U.S. dollars.